Blackarmore download log not file does not exist

What can be the problem? He will test the solution with the update of the program and he will check his harddisk, too. But what is, when the porblem is still there?

I hope that someone can help me! Thank you! And his OS is Windwos Vista. Chef32 , May 7, Hello Martin and Chef32 , Thank you for using Acronis True Image To give the issue a closer investigation please obtain the following files and submit a request to Acronis Customer Central here 1 1.

Download the file ; 2. Run the downloaded file. Running AcronisInfo may take up to 5 minutes. Download Process Monitor and run it; 2. Reproduce the issue without closing the utility; 3. Please note that to reduce the size of Process Monitor file the issue should be reproduced immediately after initializing the Process Monitor utility.

Acronis Support , May 11, Joined: Aug 6, Posts: 2. I am having the same problem. I have attempted to follow the suggestions that I saw above, but with no success I think I may have not followed them correctly- for example, When i extracted the files for the scheduler, I did not know where to extract them to. I extracted them to my desktop and then tried to run them, but don't know if it worked. Hello loriwaukee , Thank you for using Acronis True Image Actually, the issue should be resolved in the following way: You should run the bat file available here Extract the downloaded file, run install.

Reboot the computer. After that unregister the tasks and restart Acronis scheduler. This is a known issue because the signature files are not present on a Source DP that is colocated on a site server.

This issue only occurs when the distribution action is not redist. This issue may occur due to RPC port allocation failures caused by firewall. It can also occur when Windows Firewall service is disabled. Check to see if there is a firewall between the site server and the affected server and find out if RPC ports are open.

You can also capture a Network Trace from the pull DP as well as the source DP server while reproducing the error for review. In some instances normally after installation of a new pull DP when all content is sent to the pull DP , too many job failures on the pull DP can end up stalled processing of the jobs.

Although most of these issues are fixed in the recent releases of the product Configuration Manager version , some environmental factors can result in pull DP not processing jobs.

In this scenario, it can be beneficial to remove all the job-specific items from WMI on the pull DP and distribute the content again to the pull DP in a controlled manner and investigate failures. This happens when the pull DP response is processed.

Review steps in Distribute a package to pull DP to understand the flow and review the relevant logs to investigate why the state message is not getting processed. There are times when you would notice content missing from the content library.

To confirm that the content is missing from the content library, identify an affected package and track the package content from PkgLib to FileLib. Once you confirm that the required content for a Package is missing in the Content Library, see Resend compressed copy of a package to a site for information on how to re-populate the content.

In these cases, you can identify the content ID from the log and track the content from PkgLib to FileLib to ensure that the files exist. Well this time round the same Seagate NAS as before has had one drive fail, whereas the last time I had a problem no drives had failed but the NAS configuration had become corrupt. I then swapped out the damaged drive for a brand new one as it was still under warranty. There was a button to adopt it so I clicked it.

At this point I was very irritated that there was no place to be found where I could repair the raid 5 from within the NAS configuration page. I followed the same steps as before Debian 7. Big smile after that. So I gave it a shot just for fun. I wanted to let you folks know that there is this feature hidden in the system. But I think the NAS needs to adopt the new drive first and then reboot before it will show the repair raid action.

Regardless I would not trust it without having a spare backup of the data in case something goes wrong. Sorry late response: So I waited for the Raid 5 to rebuild after clicking the action button in the storage manager. When I went to check the shared folders there were none. And when I navigated to the Seagate NAS from a windows machine there seemed like there were no files or folders on the system. This puzzled me because I could see that there was space being used but no files to see.

So i started re-creating the same shared folders as there were before. Interestingly as the folders were created, they were populated with the original files. So it did actually recover the files, but it did not keep the shared folder permissions. Needless to say that is a shit system and I will be migrating all the files onto a Linux file sharing server. Thank you so much for this article and the details. I reached the 2nd assemble command and received a different message.

I then took the 4 drives back to the BA and they started back up. Thanks for the article. However when I look at the array status for each of the drives one of the drives is different. They all show to be part of the same raid 5 array, they all show a clean status, but the first drive shows a status of A.

The other two drives show the array status as AAA. The drive that shows two missing drives is device 2. Any ideas? That may be a drive that has some bad sectors. However, I am able to see it and have successfully imaged all 3 drives. Please help if you have any ideas. It does not support ext4 extents, which the filesystem on the NAS will use. Any large files, such as the iscsi target LUN, will be using extents and will read as corrupted data using fuseext2 silently, even.

Additionally, at that point, you can also optionally just mount the iscsi target directly instead of actually going through iscsi… the steps are basically:.

Thanks for the comment Vlad and the procedure. Just another reason to avoid the Live OS. However, none of the issues you described arose, and everything went very smoothly with no issues at all, even though after reading your problems, I was expecting major dramas.

I bought it second-hand and it came with 3 x 1. This is what happened. My NAS had 3 x 1. I used it on my home network i as a file server, and ii as a convenient place to store drive images of other computers while I worked on them.

The RAID 5 re-built itself without issues. Then last week, June , the 1. I decided to buy two new 2 TB drives, and replace both the remaining 1.

I also planned to move the drive in Bay 4 back to Bay 3, but one step at a time. It did the job flawlessly over the next 10 hours. My next task was to replace the 1. But then I read your article which described Drive 1 as being critical and having all the parity information on it. I was seriously concerned that if I removed Drive 1, and replaced it with a new empty drive, that the RAID would not work, and I would lose all my data.

I was impressed and relieved. Could it be that this firmware upgrade solves all the problems that led to the issues that you experienced? And because I have the spare empty drives, and I have lots of spare data that I could put onto them for testing, I can afford to scramble the RAID completely without fear of losing anything important. Thanks again for your post, it has helped me understand the process of recovering data from RAIDs next time that I might need to. This issue with the product, is due to bugs in crappy firmware.

This broke it even further… the web interface totally full of XML errors…. Another victim here, using a Seagate 4-drive Business Storage unit when drive 1 failed. Thanks for your article! Another, related problem has begun to appear with this product.

This is the issue of disk errors. The disk drive in mine, has bad sectors, and somewhat large sections of them in close proximity to each other 2TB drive. The crashed state is quite distinct the power button does nothing, and the buttons on the front panel do nothing, the stuff on the LCD remains static. The only way to recover from this is to power-cycle the unit, and if you have it set-up to e-mail you status reports, it will send you a mail saying there was an abnormal error condition.

But nobody has really done this. Hi, thanks for the guide, I have almost done it! There is just one more step to do: access the iSCSI disks from network. Is there some other way? Is it possible to copy the LUN files to some other computer and try to mount them from there?

Wanted to add my thanks for this post. Sorry this didn't help. Thanks for your feedback. Choose where you want to search below Search Search the Community. Search the community and support articles Windows Windows 7 Search Community member. Fadi AL Sheikh Aleais. Hello, I am getting this error when I am trying to open device manager, right click on computer manager and I get this error the specified path does not exist check the path and then try again and the title Explore.

This thread is locked. You can follow the question or vote as helpful, but you cannot reply to this thread. I have the same question